MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.5 (XiaoMi) versus MiMo-V2.6-Pro (XiaoMi): API pricing, context window, capabilities and uptime, from the same data as each model page, at the WandAPI default channel price. Input costs 0.75 Credits / M for MiMo-V2.5 and 2.25 Credits / M for MiMo-V2.6-Pro, so MiMo-V2.5 is 67% cheaper. Context windows are 1M and 1M.
Specs side by side
| Item | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input (prompt) · Credits / M | 0.75≈ $0.114 | 2.25≈ $0.341 |
| Output (completion) · Credits / M | 1.5≈ $0.227 | 4.5≈ $0.681 |
| Cache read · Credits / M | 0.015 | 0.0188 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| 7-day uptime | — | 100.0% |
| Latest probe latency | — | 5.29 s |
| Measured throughput | — | — |
| Protocols | Anthropic Messages / OpenAI Responses | Anthropic Messages / OpenAI Responses |
| Sample monthly cost (10M in + 2M out) | 10.5≈ $1.59 | 31.5≈ $4.77 |
Prices are the WandAPI default channel price in Credits (1 Credit = ¥1); green marks the better side. Uptime and latency come from WandAPI probes; a dash means the model is not probed yet.
Capabilities
FAQ
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
At the WandAPI default channel price, MiMo-V2.5 input costs 0.75 Credits / M and MiMo-V2.6-Pro input costs 2.25 Credits / M, so MiMo-V2.5 is 67% cheaper. Output and cache prices are in the specs table above.
Which has the larger context window, MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5 offers 1M tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Pro offers 1M tokens.
Can I switch between MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro at any time?
Yes. WandAPI calls every model with the same API key; switching is just changing the model field in the request, and billing is split per model in one console.
How do the capabilities of MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro differ?
Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro: Response Schema, Streaming, Web Search. Every other capability is either supported by both or by neither; see the capability table above.
More comparisons
One API key for both MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Free credits on sign-up, pay as you go, no monthly fee.